And now, here's another charming picture. At Christmas-time one year my daily newspaper, the Independent, was looking for a seasonal image and found a heart-warmingly ecumenical one at a school nativity play. The Three Wise Men were played by, as the caption glowingly said, Shadbreet (a Sikh), Musharaff (a Muslim) and Adele (a Christian), all aged four.
Charming? Heart-warming? No, it is not, it is neither; it is grotesque. How could any decent person think it right to label fouryear-old children with the cosmic and theological opinions of their parents? To see this, imagine an identical photograph, with the caption changed as follows: "Shadbreet (a Keynesian), Musharaff (a Monetarist) and Adele (a Marxist), all aged four". Wouldn't this be a candidate for irate letters of protest? It certainly should be. Yet, because of the weirdly privileged status of religion, not a squeak was heard, nor is it ever heard on any similar occasion. Just imagine the outcry if the caption had read, "Shadbreet (an Atheist), Musharaff (an Agnostic) and Adele (a Secular Humanist), all aged four". Mightn't the parents actually be investigated to see if they were fit to bring up children?
Richard Dawkins
